TILAK RAJ(Not Applicable) vs ROSHAN LAL(Not Applicable) — CRMP/2426/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 147. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010353122026

Filing Number

CRMP/4583/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRMP/2426/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 147
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TILAK RAJ(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Gurdev Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROSHAN LAL(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP 2426/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Tilak Raj's application to compound a cheque dishonour offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, despite his prior conviction and dismissal of his revision petition. The court held that Section 147 of the Act permits compounding even after conviction when both parties reach a settlement; accordingly, all conviction orders were quashed and Tilak Raj was acquitted. The accused was ordered to pay Rs. 5,000 litigation costs and Rs. 5,000 compounding fee to the state legal services authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/2426/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP 2426/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Tilak Raj's application to compound a cheque dishonour offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, despite his prior conviction and dismissal of his revision petition. The court held that Section 147 of the Act permits compounding even after conviction when both parties reach a settlement; accordingly, all conviction orders were quashed and Tilak Raj was acquitted. The accused was ordered to pay Rs. 5,000 litigation costs and Rs. 5,000 compounding fee to the state legal services authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case