KAVI RAJ(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/9088/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010352512026
Filing Number
CWP/30666/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
CWP/9088/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
05-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAVI RAJ(Not Applicable)
Adv. Rajesh Kumar,Rakesh Chauhan,Rakesh Chauhan, ,Rakesh Chauhan
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Lal Singh Mehta,Kanta Devi,AG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP No. 9088 of 2026 Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Kaviraj's writ petition without examining merits, granting him liberty to file an appropriate application before the Trial Court where original mark sheets are deposited. The court found the issue covered by precedent *Priya Thakur v. State of HP*, directing the Trial Court to pass appropriate orders upon such application, with all parties' rights reserved. Key Issue: Petitioner completed B.Tech degree and cleared all exams but the University failed to issue detailed marks cards, provisional/final degrees, and relevant documents. A mark mismatch existed between the Gazette (701/1200) and DMC entry (684/1200) for 3rd semester. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/9088/2026
Case Summary: CWP No. 9088 of 2026 Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Kaviraj's writ petition without examining merits, granting him liberty to file an appropriate application before the Trial Court where original mark sheets are deposited. The court found the issue covered by precedent *Priya Thakur v. State of HP*, directing the Trial Court to pass appropriate orders upon such application, with all parties' rights reserved. Key Issue: Petitioner completed B.Tech degree and cleared all exams but the University failed to issue detailed marks cards, provisional/final degrees, and relevant documents. A mark mismatch existed between the Gazette (701/1200) and DMC entry (684/1200) for 3rd semester. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts