ASHUTOSH KUMAR CHANDERVANSHI(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/603/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010352322026

Filing Number

CRMMO/4575/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/603/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHUTOSH KUMAR CHANDERVANSHI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Varun Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Balbir Singh(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMMO-603/2026 Ashutosh Kumar Chandervanshi's petition seeking quashing of FIR No.56/2025 (under Sections 281 and 125(a) BNS, registered at Kotkhai Police Station, Shimla) based on amicable settlement was adjourned. The court, while acknowledging the compromise between parties, directed respondent No.2 to appear on 19.06.2026 to verify the genuineness of the settlement. The Additional Advocate General was also directed to verify the compromise. A related petition (CRMP-2395/2026) was disposed of as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/603/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMMO-603/2026 Ashutosh Kumar Chandervanshi's petition seeking quashing of FIR No.56/2025 (under Sections 281 and 125(a) BNS, registered at Kotkhai Police Station, Shimla) based on amicable settlement was adjourned. The court, while acknowledging the compromise between parties, directed respondent No.2 to appear on 19.06.2026 to verify the genuineness of the settlement. The Additional Advocate General was also directed to verify the compromise. A related petition (CRMP-2395/2026) was disposed of as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case