ARUN KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/563/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010343682026

Filing Number

CRMMO/4458/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/563/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Kiran Lata

  2. 2.Ashok Kumar(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Kiran Lata

  3. 3.Gopal Chander(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Kiran Lata

  4. 4.Paldan Jangmo(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Kiran Lata

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.ABC(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Summary of CRMMO 563/2026: Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 28 of 2020 (involving charges under IPC Sections 363, 366(A), 376, 323, 506, 120-B and POCSO Act Sections 4 & 21) based on an alleged compromise deed. The Court, while noting the compromise submission, adjourned the petition to verify the genuineness of the settlement. Case adjourned to 18.6.2026 with directions for petitioners and Respondent No.2 to appear in person for further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/563/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRMMO 563/2026: Petitioners sought quashing of FIR No. 28 of 2020 (involving charges under IPC Sections 363, 366(A), 376, 323, 506, 120-B and POCSO Act Sections 4 & 21) based on an alleged compromise deed. The Court, while noting the compromise submission, adjourned the petition to verify the genuineness of the settlement. Case adjourned to 18.6.2026 with directions for petitioners and Respondent No.2 to appear in person for further orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case