MANOHAR LAL(Not Applicable) vs TORUL RAVEESH AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — COPC/754/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 10 & 12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010342592026
Filing Number
COPC/29801/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
COPC/754/2026
Registration Date
06-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOHAR LAL(Not Applicable)
Adv. Neel Kamal Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.TORUL RAVEESH AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Vedhant Ranta 1123
-
2.Mr. Ashok Verma(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
Case Summary: COPC/754/2026 Manohar Lal filed a contempt petition alleging the respondent corporation breached earlier court directions requiring consideration for Junior Engineer (Civil) promotion under a 4% quota. The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed the proceedings after the respondents' counsel assured the court that a Departmental Promotion Committee meeting would be convened by July 15, 2026, to fill the vacancy created by retirement and consider the petitioner's promotion candidacy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. COPC/754/2026
Case Summary: COPC/754/2026 Manohar Lal filed a contempt petition alleging the respondent corporation breached earlier court directions requiring consideration for Junior Engineer (Civil) promotion under a 4% quota. The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed the proceedings after the respondents' counsel assured the court that a Departmental Promotion Committee meeting would be convened by July 15, 2026, to fill the vacancy created by retirement and consider the petitioner's promotion candidacy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts