NITIN CHAUHAN(Not Applicable) vs HEM CHAND(Not Applicable) Advocate - Jagan Nath, NEMO — CR.R/581/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010338472025
Filing Number
CR.R/5154/2025
Filing Date
12-Jun-2025
Registration No
CR.R/581/2025
Registration Date
27-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NITIN CHAUHAN(Not Applicable)
Adv. Rajat Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.HEM CHAND(Not Applicable) Advocate - Jagan Nath, NEMO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Nitin Chauhan's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring two cheques (totaling Rs. 1,75,600) issued for apple crop purchase. The court upheld the trial court's conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, finding the accused failed to establish a probable defense against the statutory presumption that cheques were issued to discharge lawful liability, despite claiming they were security cheques. Chauhan was directed to surrender within fifteen days to serve his sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
07-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CR.R/581/2025
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Nitin Chauhan's criminal revision petition challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring two cheques (totaling Rs. 1,75,600) issued for apple crop purchase. The court upheld the trial court's conviction and one-year imprisonment sentence, finding the accused failed to establish a probable defense against the statutory presumption that cheques were issued to discharge lawful liability, despite claiming they were security cheques. Chauhan was directed to surrender within fifteen days to serve his sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts