LAL CHAND(Not Applicable) vs GEETA DEVI(Not Applicable) — CR.R/311/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 442. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010336622026

Filing Number

CR.R/4354/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

CR.R/311/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAL CHAND(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Maan Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GEETA DEVI(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CR.R 311/2026 In this criminal revision petition, Lal Chand challenged a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act conviction sentence imposed by the Trial Court (18.07.2024) and affirmed by the Appellate Court (27.02.2026). The court found prima facie arguable points regarding improper notice service to the addressee. The court suspended execution of the imprisonment sentence pending revision disposal, subject to Lal Chand depositing 30% compensation, furnishing personal and surety bonds of ₹25,000 each within six weeks, and undertaking to appear if the revision is dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  4. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.R/311/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CR.R 311/2026 In this criminal revision petition, Lal Chand challenged a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act conviction sentence imposed by the Trial Court (18.07.2024) and affirmed by the Appellate Court (27.02.2026). The court found prima facie arguable points regarding improper notice service to the addressee. The court suspended execution of the imprisonment sentence pending revision disposal, subject to Lal Chand depositing 30% compensation, furnishing personal and surety bonds of ₹25,000 each within six weeks, and undertaking to appear if the revision is dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case