SANSAR CHAND(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CMP/13117/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O1R10 S151. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010336212023

Filing Number

CMP/25983/2023

Filing Date

06-Sep-2023

Registration No

CMP/13117/2023

Registration Date

22-Sep-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O1R10 S151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANSAR CHAND(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ramesh Chand Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Vijay Singh Bhatia 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

    CMP No.13117/2023 - Summary The court found the present application infructuous after the underlying writ petition (CWP 3862/2019) was disposed on 24.04.2026. The application sought to implead new respondents due to closure of the Himachal Pradesh Staff Selection Commission; however, the court's prior order of 24.04.2026 had already substituted respondent No.3 with H.P. Rajya Chayan Aayog, Hamirpur through its Secretary. With the amended memo of parties filed pursuant to the earlier order, the application became moot and no further relief was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

  4. 06-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/13117/2023

casestatus.in Summary

CMP No.13117/2023 - Summary The court found the present application infructuous after the underlying writ petition (CWP 3862/2019) was disposed on 24.04.2026. The application sought to implead new respondents due to closure of the Himachal Pradesh Staff Selection Commission; however, the court's prior order of 24.04.2026 had already substituted respondent No.3 with H.P. Rajya Chayan Aayog, Hamirpur through its Secretary. With the amended memo of parties filed pursuant to the earlier order, the application became moot and no further relief was required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case