RUKESH CHAND(Not Applicable) vs BAL KRISHAN @ BINU AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — FAO(MV)/112/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010333122026

Filing Number

FAO(MV)/28981/2026

Filing Date

23-May-2026

Registration No

FAO(MV)/112/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUKESH CHAND(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Jagat Pal,Parul,Parul, ,Parul

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAL KRISHAN @ BINU AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.IFFCO TOKIO Gen Ins Co. Ltd.(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    In FAO(MV) No.112 of 2026, notice was issued to respondents returnable within six weeks. The court granted a stay on execution of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award dated 28.02.2026 (Claim Petition No.33 of 2023), conditional upon appellant Rukesh Chand depositing the entire awarded amount with current interest within eight weeks, pending the main appeal's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 23-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO(MV)/112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In FAO(MV) No.112 of 2026, notice was issued to respondents returnable within six weeks. The court granted a stay on execution of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award dated 28.02.2026 (Claim Petition No.33 of 2023), conditional upon appellant Rukesh Chand depositing the entire awarded amount with current interest within eight weeks, pending the main appeal's determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case