PAWANKUMAR @ PAWNA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMPM/940/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HPHC010332882026

Filing Number

CRMPM/4316/2026

Filing Date

23-May-2026

Registration No

CRMPM/940/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAWANKUMAR @ PAWNA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Santosh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.XYZ(Child victim)(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMPM/940/2026 In this matter dated 02.06.2026, the court heard arguments from the applicant Pawan Kumar @ Pawna and the State of H.P. A status report was filed and accepted. The child victim appeared in person with her mother and stated she would not engage a separate lawyer, allowing the Additional Advocate General to represent her interests. The case was adjourned for further consideration and listed for hearing on 17.06.2026, with the police record retained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  5. 26-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  6. 26-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/940/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMPM/940/2026 In this matter dated 02.06.2026, the court heard arguments from the applicant Pawan Kumar @ Pawna and the State of H.P. A status report was filed and accepted. The child victim appeared in person with her mother and stated she would not engage a separate lawyer, allowing the Additional Advocate General to represent her interests. The case was adjourned for further consideration and listed for hearing on 17.06.2026, with the police record retained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case