ASHWANI KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8753/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010331692026
Filing Number
CWP/28852/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/8753/2026
Registration Date
30-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHWANI KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Rajesh Kumar,Rakesh Chauhan,Rakesh Chauhan, ,Rakesh Chauhan
-
2.Rajgir Singh(Not Applicable)
-
3.Anitai Kumari(Not Applicable)
-
4.Karan Singh(Not Applicable)
-
5.Ramesh Chand(Not Applicable)
-
6.Pawan Kumar Bhardwaj(Not Applicable)
-
7.Sunil Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
8.Kuldeep Singh(Not Applicable)
-
9.Rakesh Kumar(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Director Higher Education(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh ruled that the State's May 8, 2025 promotion notification conferring regular promotions to the petitioners (school principals) with immediate effect but notional benefit from placement date was unlawful and discriminatory. The court directed that petitioners receive regularization benefits retroactive to their actual joining date as principals on placement basis, with all consequential financial benefits, applying the same relief granted in the parallel case Vijay Parmar v. State of Himachal Pradesh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/8753/2026
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh ruled that the State's May 8, 2025 promotion notification conferring regular promotions to the petitioners (school principals) with immediate effect but notional benefit from placement date was unlawful and discriminatory. The court directed that petitioners receive regularization benefits retroactive to their actual joining date as principals on placement basis, with all consequential financial benefits, applying the same relief granted in the parallel case Vijay Parmar v. State of Himachal Pradesh. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts