MAMTA KUMARI(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8801/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010331252026

Filing Number

CWP/28809/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/8801/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAMTA KUMARI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vishwa Bhushan,Anuja Mehta,Anuja Mehta, ,Anuja Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: In CWP No. 8801/2026, the petition by Mamta Kumari against the State of HP and others was heard on 02.06.2026. The court issued notice confined to respondents No. 1 and 2, with the State's Additional Advocate General accepting notice and directed to file reply/instructions by the next hearing date. The case was adjourned to 24.06.2026, with the court reserving decision on whether to issue notice to private respondents pending receipt of the State's reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8801/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In CWP No. 8801/2026, the petition by Mamta Kumari against the State of HP and others was heard on 02.06.2026. The court issued notice confined to respondents No. 1 and 2, with the State's Additional Advocate General accepting notice and directed to file reply/instructions by the next hearing date. The case was adjourned to 24.06.2026, with the court reserving decision on whether to issue notice to private respondents pending receipt of the State's reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case