Dhani Ram(Not Applicable) vs State of H.P.(Not Applicable) — CWPOA/363/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.
CNR: HPHC010329762019
Filing Number
CWPOA/26346/2019
Filing Date
28-Nov-2019
Registration No
CWPOA/363/2019
Registration Date
29-Nov-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dhani Ram(Not Applicable)
Adv. Rakesh Kumar Dogra
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of H.P.(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Dhani Ram's petition seeking regularization as Mechanic-cum-Fitter Grade-I from 1998 instead of Grade-II. The court held that the appointment to Grade-II was lawful under Recruitment and Promotion Rules, as Grade-I positions are filled exclusively through promotion. The petition was rejected primarily on grounds of delay—the petitioner raised the issue only in 2009, over a decade after his 1999 appointment, and failed to challenge it immediately or demonstrate any arbitrary discrimination by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
-
12-Nov-2020
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh ThakurView PDF
-
12-Nov-2020
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur
-
20-Aug-2020
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh ThakurView PDF
-
20-Aug-2020
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur
-
08-Jun-2020
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh ThakurView PDF
-
08-Jun-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2019
Case filed
Registration No. CWPOA/363/2019
Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Dhani Ram's petition seeking regularization as Mechanic-cum-Fitter Grade-I from 1998 instead of Grade-II. The court held that the appointment to Grade-II was lawful under Recruitment and Promotion Rules, as Grade-I positions are filled exclusively through promotion. The petition was rejected primarily on grounds of delay—the petitioner raised the issue only in 2009, over a decade after his 1999 appointment, and failed to challenge it immediately or demonstrate any arbitrary discrimination by the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts