NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED(Not Applicable) vs PARVEEN JAMWAL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — FAO(MV)/116/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010328532026

Filing Number

FAO(MV)/28589/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

FAO(MV)/116/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Anirudh Sharma,Shivam Sharma,Shivam Sharma, ,Srishti Negi,Shivam Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARVEEN JAMWAL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.Smt. Indu Bala(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Sh. Abhishek Kumar Sharma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO(MV) No.116/2026 NICL Vs. Parveen Jamwal & Others Notice was issued to respondents returnable within six weeks. The court stayed execution of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award dated 11.03.2026 (MACP No.22-K/II/2024), subject to NICL depositing the entire awarded amount with up-to-date interest within six weeks. The case was adjourned for further hearing after respondents file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO(MV)/116/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO(MV) No.116/2026 NICL Vs. Parveen Jamwal & Others Notice was issued to respondents returnable within six weeks. The court stayed execution of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award dated 11.03.2026 (MACP No.22-K/II/2024), subject to NICL depositing the entire awarded amount with up-to-date interest within six weeks. The case was adjourned for further hearing after respondents file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case