SHELLY KANWAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/8265/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010327492026

Filing Number

CWP/28499/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/8265/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHELLY KANWAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rajesh Kumar Parmar

  2. 2.Sh. Parveen Kumari(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Smt. Puja Sharma(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Smt. Roopali Bansod(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Director(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 8265/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Shelly Kanwar and others against the State of Himachal Pradesh, directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-4) within 12 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. No substantive relief was granted; instead, the court remitted the matter for administrative decision-making. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8265/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 8265/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Shelly Kanwar and others against the State of Himachal Pradesh, directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-4) within 12 weeks by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. No substantive relief was granted; instead, the court remitted the matter for administrative decision-making. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case