JAGDISH CHAND(Not Applicable) vs COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION,HPPWD(Not Applicable) — RFA/1/2022
Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 54. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010327092021
Filing Number
RFA/27002/2021
Filing Date
15-Nov-2021
Registration No
RFA/1/2022
Registration Date
03-Jan-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGDISH CHAND(Not Applicable)
Adv. Nimish Gupta,Mohar Singh,Mohar Singh, ,Mohar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION,HPPWD(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HPPWD(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: RFA 1/2022 - Jagdish Chand v. Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD In this land acquisition dispute, Jagdish Chand challenged compensation awarded for property acquired for NH-20 road construction. The Reference Court found no industry existed at possession in 1990 and rejected his claim for business loss compensation (1993-2003), holding the meter was intentionally changed to industrial status to inflate compensation. The case was adjourned to 19.06.2026 for the petitioner's counsel to identify any legal infirmities in the Reference Court's July 2021 order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF
-
06-Jan-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
06-Jan-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
06-Jan-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2021
Case filed
Registration No. RFA/1/2022
Case Summary: RFA 1/2022 - Jagdish Chand v. Collector Land Acquisition, HPPWD In this land acquisition dispute, Jagdish Chand challenged compensation awarded for property acquired for NH-20 road construction. The Reference Court found no industry existed at possession in 1990 and rejected his claim for business loss compensation (1993-2003), holding the meter was intentionally changed to industrial status to inflate compensation. The case was adjourned to 19.06.2026 for the petitioner's counsel to identify any legal infirmities in the Reference Court's July 2021 order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts