SONU KUMAR AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — EX.P./806/2025
Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16(1). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010324192025
Filing Number
EX.P./27458/2025
Filing Date
04-Jun-2025
Registration No
EX.P./806/2025
Registration Date
27-Jun-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONU KUMAR AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. Vishal Singh Thakur
-
2.Biswajit Ojha(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.State of H.P.(Not Applicable)
-
3.Deputy Secretary (SA)(Not Applicable)
-
4.Under Secretary (SA)(Not Applicable)
-
5.Principal Resident Commissioner(Not Applicable)
-
6.Deputy Resident Commissioner(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Execution Petition No. 806/2025 filed by Sonu Kumar and another against the State of H.P. The petitioner challenged the respondents' compliance affidavit, arguing it was faulty; however, the court noted the petitioner had already filed substantive legal remedies elsewhere to address the grievance. The petition was disposed of along with any pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Sep-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
05-Aug-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
08-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
08-Jul-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
04-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. EX.P./806/2025
Case Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Execution Petition No. 806/2025 filed by Sonu Kumar and another against the State of H.P. The petitioner challenged the respondents' compliance affidavit, arguing it was faulty; however, the court noted the petitioner had already filed substantive legal remedies elsewhere to address the grievance. The petition was disposed of along with any pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts