STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) AG vs Pyare Lal(Not Applicable) — LPA/810/2025
Case under Delhi High Court Act, 1966 Section C10. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010321062025
e-Filing Number
20-05-2025
Filing Number
LPA/27198/2025
Filing Date
03-06-2025
Registration No
LPA/810/2025
Registration Date
26-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) AG
The Ditsrict Collector Mini Secretariat Solan District Solan HP(Not Applicable)
Adv. Seema Sharma
The Executive Engineer PWD Arki District Solan HP(Not Applicable)
Adv. Seema Sharma
Respondent(s)
Pyare Lal(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Anirudh R.H.Sharma 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN CHANDER NEGI
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-01-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 02-04-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
Orders
Summary of LPA No. 810 of 2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the Single Judge's order directing the State to initiate land acquisition proceedings for Pyare Lal's property, which was used without compensation for constructing the "Jawra Kainchi to Dhrial" road in 2010. The court found no delay in filing the petition, rejected the State's argument about oral consent/donation, and held that Article 300-A of the Constitution requires the State to formally acquire and compensate for land utilized for public purposes, not unilaterally use it without legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of LPA No. 810 of 2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the Single Judge's order directing the State to initiate land acquisition proceedings for Pyare Lal's property, which was used without compensation for constructing the "Jawra Kainchi to Dhrial" road in 2010. The court found no delay in filing the petition, rejected the State's argument about oral consent/donation, and held that Article 300-A of the Constitution requires the State to formally acquire and compensate for land utilized for public purposes, not unilaterally use it without legal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts