AMIT KASHYAP(Not Applicable) MUKUL SOOD vs STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6000/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010320902023

Filing Number

CWP/24742/2023

Filing Date

29-Aug-2023

Registration No

CWP/6000/2023

Registration Date

31-Aug-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT KASHYAP(Not Applicable) MUKUL SOOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Worthy Director of Animal Husbandry(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Dr. Namrata Sharma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the writ petitions filed by Amit Kashyap and Dr. Ruchi Malhotra challenging transfer orders dated 26.08.2023, as the petitions had become infructuous. Since the petitioners were adequately adjusted in their new positions and no interim protection was initially granted, the court found no surviving issues and disposed of both petitions accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Sep-2023

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 01-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  5. 01-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6000/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the writ petitions filed by Amit Kashyap and Dr. Ruchi Malhotra challenging transfer orders dated 26.08.2023, as the petitions had become infructuous. Since the petitioners were adequately adjusted in their new positions and no interim protection was initially granted, the court found no surviving issues and disposed of both petitions accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case