RUCHI MALHOTRA(Not Applicable) MUKUL SOOD vs STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6001/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010320892023

Filing Number

CWP/24741/2023

Filing Date

29-Aug-2023

Registration No

CWP/6001/2023

Registration Date

31-Aug-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUCHI MALHOTRA(Not Applicable) MUKUL SOOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Director of Animal Husbandry(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Dr. Rakesh Kumar Nayar(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary of CWP No. 6001/2023 The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petitions filed by Dr. Ruchi Malhotra and Amit Kashyap challenging their transfers dated 26.08.2023 as infructuous. The court found the petitions rendered moot because the petitioners had been adequately adjusted in their new positions and no interim protection was initially granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Sep-2023

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 01-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  5. 01-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6001/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP No. 6001/2023 The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petitions filed by Dr. Ruchi Malhotra and Amit Kashyap challenging their transfers dated 26.08.2023 as infructuous. The court found the petitions rendered moot because the petitioners had been adequately adjusted in their new positions and no interim protection was initially granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case