LALIT KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/9346/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010320022025

Filing Number

CWP/27114/2025

Filing Date

03-Jun-2025

Registration No

CWP/9346/2025

Registration Date

04-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALIT KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rajat Kumar,Ramesh Chand Sharma,Ramesh Chand Sharma, ,Ramesh Chand Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.State of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.State of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The Superintending Engineer,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer,(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.The Engineer-in-Chief(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 9346/2025 - Lalit Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of this petition by applying findings from the earlier case CWP No. 3361/2025, which had already quashed the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024 as unconstitutional and illegal. The court directed that the petitioner's representation to the Principal Secretary be decided by June 30, 2026, following established principles regarding pensionary benefits for contract employees—including counting contract service periods for pension calculations when proper recruitment procedures were followed, and ensuring all consequential actions based on the invalidated Act be nullified within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Pronouncement Of Judgment

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  4. 23-Sep-2025

    Final Disposal At The Admission Stage

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  7. 19-Aug-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  8. 15-Jul-2025

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  9. 24-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  10. 05-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  11. 05-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9346/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 9346/2025 - Lalit Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of this petition by applying findings from the earlier case CWP No. 3361/2025, which had already quashed the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024 as unconstitutional and illegal. The court directed that the petitioner's representation to the Principal Secretary be decided by June 30, 2026, following established principles regarding pensionary benefits for contract employees—including counting contract service periods for pension calculations when proper recruitment procedures were followed, and ensuring all consequential actions based on the invalidated Act be nullified within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case