KIRAN KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs PARO DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Ajay Kumar Dhiman — CRMPM/1664/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419(4). Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010317962025

Filing Number

CRMPM/4834/2025

Filing Date

02-Jun-2025

Registration No

CRMPM/1664/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 419(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRAN KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Mukul Sood

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARO DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Ajay Kumar Dhiman

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMPM /1664/2025 In Kiran Kumar vs. Paro Devi, the matter was heard on 23rd March 2026 with both parties represented by counsel. The court, at the request of the applicant's counsel, adjourned the case and listed it for consideration after two weeks. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 23-Dec-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  7. 12-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  9. 17-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  10. 17-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  11. 02-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMPM/1664/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMPM /1664/2025 In Kiran Kumar vs. Paro Devi, the matter was heard on 23rd March 2026 with both parties represented by counsel. The court, at the request of the applicant's counsel, adjourned the case and listed it for consideration after two weeks. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case