DINA NATH(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/7105/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010316402023
Filing Number
CWP/24383/2023
Filing Date
26-Aug-2023
Registration No
CWP/7105/2023
Registration Date
28-Sep-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DINA NATH(Not Applicable)
Adv. Kashmir Singh Thakur,Arjit Singh,Arjit Singh, Arjit Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Director General of Police(Not Applicable)
-
3.The Superintendent of Police,(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
Case Summary: CWP No. 7105 of 2023 The petition was adjourned. The court noted that the Superintendent of Police's 2012 inquiry report found no dereliction of duty against petitioner Dina Nath, who was only cautious in performing his duties. The petitioner's counsel was directed to place the office order on record, and the Deputy Advocate General was directed to obtain instructions. The matter is listed for hearing on 03.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
17-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
03-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
18-Jun-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
22-Apr-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
30-Nov-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
19-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
19-Oct-2023
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
-
26-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/7105/2023
Case Summary: CWP No. 7105 of 2023 The petition was adjourned. The court noted that the Superintendent of Police's 2012 inquiry report found no dereliction of duty against petitioner Dina Nath, who was only cautious in performing his duties. The petitioner's counsel was directed to place the office order on record, and the Deputy Advocate General was directed to obtain instructions. The matter is listed for hearing on 03.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts