MOHD. NAZIM(Not Applicable) vs NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — COPC/689/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: HPHC010315082026

Filing Number

COPC/27424/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

COPC/689/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. NAZIM(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashok Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Dheeraj Kumar Vashishat 1123

  2. 2.Maneet Verma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    Summary: In Contempt Petition No. 689/2026, Mohd. Nazim alleged non-compliance with a prior court judgment (CWP No. 6885/2023) ordering two additional salary increments. The respondents submitted only an initiation letter regarding the increments process, which the court found insufficient. The court rejected this as inadequate compliance and directed respondents to file comprehensive reply/compliance by 24.06.2026, warning that respondents must appear in person if they fail to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/689/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Contempt Petition No. 689/2026, Mohd. Nazim alleged non-compliance with a prior court judgment (CWP No. 6885/2023) ordering two additional salary increments. The respondents submitted only an initiation letter regarding the increments process, which the court found insufficient. The court rejected this as inadequate compliance and directed respondents to file comprehensive reply/compliance by 24.06.2026, warning that respondents must appear in person if they fail to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case