GEETA DEVI(Not Applicable) vs GIAN CHAND KAINTHLA(Not Applicable) — CR.R/315/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010313382026

Filing Number

CR.R/4049/2026

Filing Date

16-May-2026

Registration No

CR.R/315/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GEETA DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Shiv Darshan Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GIAN CHAND KAINTHLA(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    In CR.R 315/2026 (Geeta Devi vs. Gian Chand Kainthla), the court found prima facie arguable points based on the complainant's admissions that he had advanced only ₹1,00,000 (not ₹1,10,300 as claimed) and charged ₹10,300 as interest/cost despite claiming no interest. Notice was issued to the respondent returnable in four weeks. Additionally, the court suspended the imprisonment sentence imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, subject to the petitioner depositing 30% compensation and furnishing a ₹50,000 personal bond with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  4. 16-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.R/315/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In CR.R 315/2026 (Geeta Devi vs. Gian Chand Kainthla), the court found prima facie arguable points based on the complainant's admissions that he had advanced only ₹1,00,000 (not ₹1,10,300 as claimed) and charged ₹10,300 as interest/cost despite claiming no interest. Notice was issued to the respondent returnable in four weeks. Additionally, the court suspended the imprisonment sentence imposed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, subject to the petitioner depositing 30% compensation and furnishing a ₹50,000 personal bond with surety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case