M/S SALUS PHARMACEAUTICALS AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs UNION OF INDIA(Not Applicable) Advocate - ASGI, ,ASGI — CRMMO/929/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010307982023
Filing Number
CRMMO/7071/2023
Filing Date
21-Aug-2023
Registration No
CRMMO/929/2023
Registration Date
12-Sep-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S SALUS PHARMACEAUTICALS AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Anuj Nag,Hakam Bhardwaj,Hakam Bhardwaj, ,Hakam Bhardwaj
-
2.Atul Garg(Not Applicable)
Adv. Anuj Nag
-
3.Abhinav Garg(Not Applicable)
Adv. Anuj Nag
-
4.Meenakshi Joshi(Not Applicable)
Adv. Anuj Nag
-
5.Krishan Joshi(Not Applicable)
Adv. Anuj Nag
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA(Not Applicable) Advocate - ASGI, ,ASGI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: CRMMO 929/2023 Court Decision (07.05.2026): The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed the criminal complaint against M/s Salus Pharmaceuticals and its partners under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The court found the prosecution was an abuse of process on three grounds: (1) a Central Government Drugs Inspector lacks jurisdiction over Chapter IV offences—only State Inspectors have executive authority for manufacture/sale regulation; (2) partners accused lacked specific averments showing they were "in charge of and responsible" for daily operations, violating vicarious liability requirements; (3) the drug sample analysis violated Rule 45's mandatory 60-day testing period, prejudicing the accused's right to challenge the Government Analyst's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
09-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
09-Dec-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
18-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
23-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
23-Sep-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
09-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
19-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
19-Aug-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
24-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
19-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
19-Jun-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
03-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
03-Jun-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
21-May-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
21-May-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
12-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
03-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
03-Jan-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi
-
12-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
18-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
30-Sep-2024
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
12-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
12-Jun-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
23-Apr-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
06-Dec-2023
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
22-Nov-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
22-Nov-2023
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
13-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
13-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CRMMO/929/2023
CASE SUMMARY: CRMMO 929/2023 Court Decision (07.05.2026): The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed the criminal complaint against M/s Salus Pharmaceuticals and its partners under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The court found the prosecution was an abuse of process on three grounds: (1) a Central Government Drugs Inspector lacks jurisdiction over Chapter IV offences—only State Inspectors have executive authority for manufacture/sale regulation; (2) partners accused lacked specific averments showing they were "in charge of and responsible" for daily operations, violating vicarious liability requirements; (3) the drug sample analysis violated Rule 45's mandatory 60-day testing period, prejudicing the accused's right to challenge the Government Analyst's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts