SANJAY KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs NIPUN JINDAL(Not Applicable) — COPC/669/2025
Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 2&12. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010307802025
Filing Number
COPC/26089/2025
Filing Date
29-May-2025
Registration No
COPC/669/2025
Registration Date
09-Jul-2025
Judge
Additional Registrar(j)
Coram
Additional Registrar(j)
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY KUMAR(Not Applicable)
Adv. Mandeep Chandel
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIPUN JINDAL(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Rahul Thakur 1123
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
Case Summary: COPC No. 669 of 2025 On 06.05.2026, the court adjourned the petition pending receipt of a counter to the compliance affidavit and a report from the Scrutiny Section. Although the dealing assistant's report indicated the counter affidavit was awaited, the petitioner's counsel represented on 10.03.2026 that it had already been filed. The case was directed to be processed further after the Scrutiny Section submits its report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
17-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
22-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
18-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
18-Jul-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
29-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. COPC/669/2025
Case Summary: COPC No. 669 of 2025 On 06.05.2026, the court adjourned the petition pending receipt of a counter to the compliance affidavit and a report from the Scrutiny Section. Although the dealing assistant's report indicated the counter affidavit was awaited, the petitioner's counsel represented on 10.03.2026 that it had already been filed. The case was directed to be processed further after the Scrutiny Section submits its report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts