HANS RAJ(Not Applicable) vs MAYA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO — RSA/179/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Disposed: Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010303732024

Filing Number

RSA/24288/2024

Filing Date

10-Jul-2024

Registration No

RSA/179/2024

Registration Date

12-Jul-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HANS RAJ(Not Applicable)

    Adv. G R Palsra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAYA DEVI(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    Summary of RSA No. 179/2024 Hans Raj filed a suit seeking declaration that an alleged marriage with Maya Devi was null and void, claiming it was fraudulently created through forged affidavits without his consent or solemnization. The trial court and District Court dismissed the suit, finding lack of jurisdiction to grant such relief. On second appeal, the High Court permitted the plaintiff to withdraw the suit with liberty to refile before a competent court under appropriate legal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 03-Jan-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  5. 24-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  6. 12-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  7. 17-Jul-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  8. 17-Jul-2024

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  9. 10-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/179/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of RSA No. 179/2024 Hans Raj filed a suit seeking declaration that an alleged marriage with Maya Devi was null and void, claiming it was fraudulently created through forged affidavits without his consent or solemnization. The trial court and District Court dismissed the suit, finding lack of jurisdiction to grant such relief. On second appeal, the High Court permitted the plaintiff to withdraw the suit with liberty to refile before a competent court under appropriate legal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case