ANUPAM CHANDEL(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8912/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010302822025

Filing Number

CWP/25683/2025

Filing Date

27-May-2025

Registration No

CWP/8912/2025

Registration Date

27-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUPAM CHANDEL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Surinder Kumar Sharma,Neeraj Sharma,Neeraj Sharma, ,Neeraj Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Secretary,(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Balvinder Singh

  3. 3.The Principal(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Abhinav Purohit

  4. 4.City Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 8912/2025 (Anupam Chandel vs. State & Ors.), the court adjourned the case to the third week of May 2026. The reply filed by respondents was noted as not being on record and directed to be placed on record if found in order. No substantive orders on the merits were passed at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 16-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 28-May-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  6. 28-May-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  7. 27-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8912/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Writ Petition No. 8912/2025 (Anupam Chandel vs. State & Ors.), the court adjourned the case to the third week of May 2026. The reply filed by respondents was noted as not being on record and directed to be placed on record if found in order. No substantive orders on the merits were passed at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case