TARUN PATHANIA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/3529/2020

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010302632020

Filing Number

CWP/26587/2020

Filing Date

07-Sep-2020

Registration No

CWP/3529/2020

Registration Date

07-Sep-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TARUN PATHANIA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Naresh Kaul,Sheetal Kaul,Sheetal Kaul, ,Sheetal Kaul

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 3529/2020 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the civil writ petition filed by Tarun Pathania against the State of H.P. on 23rd March 2026. The petitioner's counsel stated that due to intervening developments and passage of time, the petition had become infructuous (devoid of purpose), and the court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition along with all pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Sep-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan BarowaliaView PDF

  4. 08-Sep-2020

    Specially Fixed

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia

  5. 07-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/3529/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 3529/2020 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the civil writ petition filed by Tarun Pathania against the State of H.P. on 23rd March 2026. The petitioner's counsel stated that due to intervening developments and passage of time, the petition had become infructuous (devoid of purpose), and the court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition along with all pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case