STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) AG vs Dina Nath and others(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/762/2026
Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010302512026
Filing Number
CMP.M/26315/2026
Filing Date
14-May-2026
Registration No
CMP.M/762/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) AG
-
2.The Principal Secretary Personnel(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dina Nath and others(Not Applicable)
-
2.Ramesh Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
3.Uma Thakur(Not Applicable)
-
4.Subhash Thakur(Not Applicable)
-
5.Naveen Thakur(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's review petition seeking to overturn an April 2025 judgment that had quashed the State's decision to fill 10 Junior Superintendent posts on secondment basis, finding the recruitment violated applicable recruitment rules. The court rejected the State's attempt to introduce Rule 170(5) of HP Financial Rules as a new defense, holding that review petitions cannot be used for rehearing cases or raising grounds not previously argued, and that no apparent error existed on the record's face. Additionally, the court found the 312-day delay in filing the review petition was not adequately explained and dismissed both the delay condonation application and the main review petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
14-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CMP.M/762/2026
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the State's review petition seeking to overturn an April 2025 judgment that had quashed the State's decision to fill 10 Junior Superintendent posts on secondment basis, finding the recruitment violated applicable recruitment rules. The court rejected the State's attempt to introduce Rule 170(5) of HP Financial Rules as a new defense, holding that review petitions cannot be used for rehearing cases or raising grounds not previously argued, and that no apparent error existed on the record's face. Additionally, the court found the 312-day delay in filing the review petition was not adequately explained and dismissed both the delay condonation application and the main review petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts