BHUPINDER PAL MAHAJAN(Not Applicable) vs THE NEW ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED(Not Applicable) Advocate - Praneet Gupta, ,Praneet Gupta — CWP/10206/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010300692025

Filing Number

CWP/25498/2025

Filing Date

26-May-2025

Registration No

CWP/10206/2025

Registration Date

25-Jun-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUPINDER PAL MAHAJAN(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vivek Negi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE NEW ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED(Not Applicable) Advocate - Praneet Gupta, ,Praneet Gupta

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    In CWP No. 10206 of 2025, Bhupinder Pal Mahajan v. The New Assurance Company Ltd., the court hearing on March 23, 2026 resulted in the case being adjourned by three weeks at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 27-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  5. 24-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  7. 06-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  8. 07-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  9. 30-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  10. 30-Jun-2025

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  11. 26-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/10206/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In CWP No. 10206 of 2025, Bhupinder Pal Mahajan v. The New Assurance Company Ltd., the court hearing on March 23, 2026 resulted in the case being adjourned by three weeks at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on merits was passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case