LEELADHAR(Not Applicable) vs CHANDER PAUL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CR.R/316/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010294782026

Filing Number

CR.R/3809/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CR.R/316/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438/442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LEELADHAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Hemant Kumar Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDER PAUL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.State of HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    Summary of CR.R/316/2026 (Leeladhar vs. Chander Paul & Anr.) The court issued notice to respondents returnable within six weeks on Cr. Revision No. 316/2026. In the interim application (Cr. MP No. 2277/2026), the court suspended the sentence imposed by the trial court (18.04.2024) and affirmed by Additional Sessions Judge (31.03.2026), pending final disposal of the petition. Petitioner must deposit 30% of compensation within four weeks and furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety, undertaking to appear as directed; if the petition is dismissed, the applicant must surrender to undergo the imposed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.R/316/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CR.R/316/2026 (Leeladhar vs. Chander Paul & Anr.) The court issued notice to respondents returnable within six weeks on Cr. Revision No. 316/2026. In the interim application (Cr. MP No. 2277/2026), the court suspended the sentence imposed by the trial court (18.04.2024) and affirmed by Additional Sessions Judge (31.03.2026), pending final disposal of the petition. Petitioner must deposit 30% of compensation within four weeks and furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety, undertaking to appear as directed; if the petition is dismissed, the applicant must surrender to undergo the imposed sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case