PANKAJ SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/468/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010291932026

Filing Number

CRMMO/3770/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRMMO/468/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Rakesh Kumar Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Nitin Verma(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Arun Rana

  3. 3.Kashmir Singh Verma(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Arun Rana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  3. 18-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

    Summary: Pankaj Sharma sought quashing of FIR No. 6 of 2026 (filed under Sections 281 and 125(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita at Palampur police station) based on an amicable settlement with the respondents. The court acknowledged the compromise placed on record but adjourned proceedings to 02.06.2026 to verify the genuineness of the settlement, summoning respondents Nitin Verma and Kashmir Singh Verma to confirm their voluntary consent to the compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  5. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMMO/468/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Pankaj Sharma sought quashing of FIR No. 6 of 2026 (filed under Sections 281 and 125(a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita at Palampur police station) based on an amicable settlement with the respondents. The court acknowledged the compromise placed on record but adjourned proceedings to 02.06.2026 to verify the genuineness of the settlement, summoning respondents Nitin Verma and Kashmir Singh Verma to confirm their voluntary consent to the compromise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case