KUSHAM LAL(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8752/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010274632026

Filing Number

CWP/23905/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/8752/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUSHAM LAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Balwant Singh Thakur,Nargis Mehta,Nargis Mehta, ,Rinkle,Anchal Sharma,Nargis Mehta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Engincer in Chicf Irigation and Public Health(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Exccutive Engineer, Irrigation and Public Health Department(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.The A ssistant Engineer, rrigation and Public Health Department Sub-Division Chirgaon(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner should have first approached the competent administrative authority before seeking judicial relief. The court directed the petitioner to file a representation with the competent authority within 4 weeks, which must be decided within 12 weeks thereafter with a reasoned order considering the petitioner's submissions and cited judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8752/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the writ petition, holding that the petitioner should have first approached the competent administrative authority before seeking judicial relief. The court directed the petitioner to file a representation with the competent authority within 4 weeks, which must be decided within 12 weeks thereafter with a reasoned order considering the petitioner's submissions and cited judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case