NARENDER KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6773/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010271452026

Filing Number

CWP/23629/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/6773/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARENDER KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Bodh Raj,Devender Kumar,Devender Kumar, ,Devender Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Engineer-in-Chief(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Executive Engineer,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Executive Engineer(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Narender Kumar's petition challenging his transfer from Sarkaghat Division to ENC Shimla without quashing the transfer order, finding the transfer justified due to lack of available work at his previous posting. The court directed the petitioner to join his new station and permitted him to request reassignment to another station after reasonable time, with the authority to consider such representation sympathetically if work becomes available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6773/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Narender Kumar's petition challenging his transfer from Sarkaghat Division to ENC Shimla without quashing the transfer order, finding the transfer justified due to lack of available work at his previous posting. The court directed the petitioner to join his new station and permitted him to request reassignment to another station after reasonable time, with the authority to consider such representation sympathetically if work becomes available. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case