RAJESH KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6697/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010269452026

Filing Number

CWP/23472/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/6697/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Varun Rana

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,Kiran Dhiman 1123

  2. 2.Managing Director(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Director (Center Zone) HP State Forest Development Corporation(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Divisional Manager Headquarter(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Rajesh Kumar's petition challenging the cancellation of his relieving order. The petitioner's transfer was suspended due to a state-wide ban on transfers imposed for upcoming Panchayati Raj elections. The court directed that once the transfer ban is lifted, the petitioner and his counterpart shall be relieved within one week to join their respective stations, and that the transfer order shall not be cancelled in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6697/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Rajesh Kumar's petition challenging the cancellation of his relieving order. The petitioner's transfer was suspended due to a state-wide ban on transfers imposed for upcoming Panchayati Raj elections. The court directed that once the transfer ban is lifted, the petitioner and his counterpart shall be relieved within one week to join their respective stations, and that the transfer order shall not be cancelled in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case