BIDHI SINGH(Not Applicable) vs HRTC AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8274/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010268332026

Filing Number

CWP/23381/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/8274/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIDHI SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ganesh Barowalia,Nikhil Ghonkrokta,Nikhil Ghonkrokta, ,Vishav Vijay Singh,Nikhil Ghonkrokta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HRTC AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Rahul 1123

  2. 2.The Managing Director,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Divisional Manager(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Regional Manager(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Bidhi Singh's writ petition against Himachal Road Transport Corporation, directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-5) within 12 weeks by issuing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court essentially remitted the matter back to the administrative authority for proper consideration and decision-making. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Bidhi Singh's writ petition against Himachal Road Transport Corporation, directing the competent authority to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-5) within 12 weeks by issuing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court essentially remitted the matter back to the administrative authority for proper consideration and decision-making. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case