SARVESH KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/7109/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010266822026

Filing Number

CWP/23233/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/7109/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARVESH KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Arun Rana,Rakesh Kumar Sharma,Rakesh Kumar Sharma, ,Rakesh Kumar Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Prince Chauhan,AG 1123

  2. 2.Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Controller,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 7109/2026 In this writ petition filed by Sarvesh Kumar against the State of Himachal Pradesh and others, the court disposed of the interim application (CMP No. 10243/2026) by directing that no coercive action or recovery shall be taken against the petitioner pending the resolution of the writ petition, without court's leave. The matter was heard on 08.05.2026 with all parties present through their respective counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/7109/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 7109/2026 In this writ petition filed by Sarvesh Kumar against the State of Himachal Pradesh and others, the court disposed of the interim application (CMP No. 10243/2026) by directing that no coercive action or recovery shall be taken against the petitioner pending the resolution of the writ petition, without court's leave. The matter was heard on 08.05.2026 with all parties present through their respective counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case