AVTAR SINGH DHIMAN(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/6046/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010262982024
Filing Number
CWP/20990/2024
Filing Date
22-Jun-2024
Registration No
CWP/6046/2024
Registration Date
29-Jun-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AVTAR SINGH DHIMAN(Not Applicable)
Adv. Shubham Sood
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.The Director of Higher Education Lalpani,(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Avtar Singh Dhiman's petition challenging Office Memorandums dated 17.09.2022 and 13.03.2024 regarding retirement benefits. Rather than adjudicating the matter, the court directed that a similar pending case (CWP No. 8504 of 2025) before the Division Bench would be binding on all parties, and the petitioner must abide by that decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
11-Jul-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
22-May-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
01-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
08-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
08-Jul-2024
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi
-
22-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/6046/2024
Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Avtar Singh Dhiman's petition challenging Office Memorandums dated 17.09.2022 and 13.03.2024 regarding retirement benefits. Rather than adjudicating the matter, the court directed that a similar pending case (CWP No. 8504 of 2025) before the Division Bench would be binding on all parties, and the petitioner must abide by that decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts