ANJNA KUMARI(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/6050/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010262812024
Filing Number
CWP/20973/2024
Filing Date
22-Jun-2024
Registration No
CWP/6050/2024
Registration Date
29-Jun-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANJNA KUMARI(Not Applicable)
Adv. Shubham Sood
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.The Director of Elementary Education(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
Summary: Anjna Kumari's writ petition seeking quashing of office memoranda and release of retiral benefits (gratuity, leave encashment, revised pay arrears, and pension with 12% interest) was disposed of. The court noted similar matters were pending before the Division Bench in CWP 8504/2025 and directed that the Division Bench's decision would be binding on all parties, effectively staying individual adjudication pending the consolidated ruling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Sep-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
29-Jul-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
22-May-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
20-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
11-Dec-2024
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
12-Nov-2024
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
19-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
08-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
08-Jul-2024
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi
-
22-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/6050/2024
Summary: Anjna Kumari's writ petition seeking quashing of office memoranda and release of retiral benefits (gratuity, leave encashment, revised pay arrears, and pension with 12% interest) was disposed of. The court noted similar matters were pending before the Division Bench in CWP 8504/2025 and directed that the Division Bench's decision would be binding on all parties, effectively staying individual adjudication pending the consolidated ruling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts