SANJAY KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE HRTC AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/7111/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010261642026

Filing Number

CWP/22769/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/7111/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Parav Sharma,Srishti Ramesh,Srishti Ramesh, ,Rupesh Kumar,Shekhar Badola,Avnish Mandhotra,Vishali Lakhanpal,Srishti Ramesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE HRTC AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Deepak Sharma 1123

  2. 2.Managing Director,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Regional Manager,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP 7111/2026 – Sanjay Kumar v. HRTC The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed the HRTC's order dated 31.03.2026 that withdrew demobilized armed forces benefits and reduced the petitioner's salary, finding the order violated natural justice principles as it was issued without granting the petitioner a hearing opportunity. However, the court allowed the HRTC liberty to reissue the notice and take appropriate action while strictly adhering to principles of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/7111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP 7111/2026 – Sanjay Kumar v. HRTC The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed the HRTC's order dated 31.03.2026 that withdrew demobilized armed forces benefits and reduced the petitioner's salary, finding the order violated natural justice principles as it was issued without granting the petitioner a hearing opportunity. However, the court allowed the HRTC liberty to reissue the notice and take appropriate action while strictly adhering to principles of natural justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case