SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8253/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010260462026

Filing Number

CWP/22661/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/8253/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vaibhav Tanwar

  2. 2.Swati Devi,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Renuka Devi,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Santosh Kumari,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Vandana Yadav,(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Kumari Ranjana,(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Suresh Kumar and others against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the competent authority to decide the petitioners' representation (Annexure P-1) within 12 weeks from the judgment date, by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court essentially remitted the matter back to the administrative authority for a fresh decision on the merits of the representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Suresh Kumar and others against the State of Himachal Pradesh by directing the competent authority to decide the petitioners' representation (Annexure P-1) within 12 weeks from the judgment date, by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. The court essentially remitted the matter back to the administrative authority for a fresh decision on the merits of the representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case