KAMAL MACHHAN(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/2934/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 25th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010258462019
Filing Number
CWP/20308/2019
Filing Date
16-Oct-2019
Registration No
CWP/2934/2019
Registration Date
16-Oct-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
25-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMAL MACHHAN(Not Applicable)
Adv. Bhagwati Chander Verma,Pradeep Verma,Pradeep Verma, ,Digvijay Singh Bisht,Sumit Sharma,Mohinder Verma,Pradeep Verma
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
CWP No. 2934/2019 was disposed of along with related petitions on 25.05.2026. Kamal Machhan, a shop tenant under Municipal Council Rohru, challenged rent enhancement notices and eviction proceedings under the H.P. Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1971. The court dismissed the petition as premature, holding that pending eviction proceedings before the competent authority must be concluded first, allowing petitioner to contest those proceedings and seek appropriate remedy thereafter if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
17-Oct-2019
Honourable The Chief Justice L. Narayana Swamy,honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand ChaudharyView PDF
-
17-Oct-2019
Notice Before Admission
Honourable The Chief Justice L. Narayana Swamy , Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary
-
16-Oct-2019
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/2934/2019
CWP No. 2934/2019 was disposed of along with related petitions on 25.05.2026. Kamal Machhan, a shop tenant under Municipal Council Rohru, challenged rent enhancement notices and eviction proceedings under the H.P. Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1971. The court dismissed the petition as premature, holding that pending eviction proceedings before the competent authority must be concluded first, allowing petitioner to contest those proceedings and seek appropriate remedy thereafter if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts