ASHOK KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/8707/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010258382026

Filing Number

CWP/22470/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/8707/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Dhananjay Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE BLOCK MEDICAL OFFICER AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Shri Baldev Kumar(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 8707/2026 In this civil writ petition by Ashok Kumar against the Block Development Officer and another, the court adjourned the case for further proceedings. Notice was issued to respondent No. 2 (returnable within four weeks), with respondent No. 1 (State) waiving service. The court directed respondent No. 1 to file a reply meanwhile. Additionally, a connected application (CMP No. 12699/2026) was disposed with directions requiring the applicant to file translated copies of documents before the next hearing scheduled after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8707/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 8707/2026 In this civil writ petition by Ashok Kumar against the Block Development Officer and another, the court adjourned the case for further proceedings. Notice was issued to respondent No. 2 (returnable within four weeks), with respondent No. 1 (State) waiving service. The court directed respondent No. 1 to file a reply meanwhile. Additionally, a connected application (CMP No. 12699/2026) was disposed with directions requiring the applicant to file translated copies of documents before the next hearing scheduled after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case