KISH PAL(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/2933/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 25th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010258362019

Filing Number

CWP/20298/2019

Filing Date

16-Oct-2019

Registration No

CWP/2933/2019

Registration Date

16-Oct-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISH PAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Bhagwati Chander Verma,Pradeep Verma,Pradeep Verma, ,Digvijay Singh Bisht,Sumit Sharma,Mohinder Verma,Pradeep Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed CWP 2933/2019 (Kish Pal v. State of H.P.) as premature, finding that eviction proceedings under the H.P. Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1971 were already pending before a competent court. The petitioner, who challenged the enhanced rent notice and eviction proceedings, was directed to contest those proceedings through appropriate legal remedies rather than via this writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  4. 17-Oct-2019

    Honourable The Chief Justice L. Narayana Swamy,honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand ChaudharyView PDF

  5. 17-Oct-2019

    Notice Before Admission

    Honourable The Chief Justice L. Narayana Swamy , Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary

  6. 16-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/2933/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed CWP 2933/2019 (Kish Pal v. State of H.P.) as premature, finding that eviction proceedings under the H.P. Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1971 were already pending before a competent court. The petitioner, who challenged the enhanced rent notice and eviction proceedings, was directed to contest those proceedings through appropriate legal remedies rather than via this writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case