RAM RAJ(Not Applicable) vs ISHAR DASS (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRs NIKKI DEVI) AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/6707/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010258232026
Filing Number
CWP/22455/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWP/6707/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAM RAJ(Not Applicable)
Adv. Vivek Negi
Respondent(s)
-
1.ISHAR DASS (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRs NIKKI DEVI) AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,NEMO 1123
-
2.Sh Mahanta Ram(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/6707/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Ram Raj's writ petition challenging the partition order. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua upheld the Financial Commissioner's decision affirming the partition proceedings initiated in 2006, finding that the petitioner's objections—particularly regarding non-preparation of 'Fard Kabja' (possession list)—were raised too late and lacked merit. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the partition mode was finalized in 2007 and affirmed through concurrent orders by multiple revenue authorities between 2008-2013, which attained finality after the petitioner's earlier revision petitions were dismissed. The petitioner subsequently accepted the allotted land in June 2018 without objection, thereby precluding him from later challenging the partition proceedings that had been dragging on since 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Office Objection
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/6707/2026
Case Summary: CWP/6707/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Ram Raj's writ petition challenging the partition order. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua upheld the Financial Commissioner's decision affirming the partition proceedings initiated in 2006, finding that the petitioner's objections—particularly regarding non-preparation of 'Fard Kabja' (possession list)—were raised too late and lacked merit. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the partition mode was finalized in 2007 and affirmed through concurrent orders by multiple revenue authorities between 2008-2013, which attained finality after the petitioner's earlier revision petitions were dismissed. The petitioner subsequently accepted the allotted land in June 2018 without objection, thereby precluding him from later challenging the partition proceedings that had been dragging on since 2006. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts