KAMLINI KUMAR GUPTA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/3123/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010258132019
Filing Number
CWP/20277/2019
Filing Date
16-Oct-2019
Registration No
CWP/3123/2019
Registration Date
24-Oct-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMLINI KUMAR GUPTA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Yash Wardhan Chauhan,Nitin Thakur,Nitin Thakur, ,Raj Negi,Nitin Thakur
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition with directions to the Competent Authority to re-examine the petitioner's representation regarding the retention of his pledged FDRs, considering whether he met the 80% minimum guaranteed quota benchmark as per Clause 4.3 of the Excise Announcements. The petitioner must be given a hearing opportunity and permitted to submit additional documents, with the decision to be made within six weeks; if the decision goes against him, his FDRs cannot be encashed for two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
07-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
25-Oct-2019
Honourable The Chief Justice L. Narayana Swamy,honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand ChaudharyView PDF
-
25-Oct-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Oct-2019
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/3123/2019
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition with directions to the Competent Authority to re-examine the petitioner's representation regarding the retention of his pledged FDRs, considering whether he met the 80% minimum guaranteed quota benchmark as per Clause 4.3 of the Excise Announcements. The petitioner must be given a hearing opportunity and permitted to submit additional documents, with the decision to be made within six weeks; if the decision goes against him, his FDRs cannot be encashed for two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts