BHAGAT RAM(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6621/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010257562026

Filing Number

CWP/22397/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/6621/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAGAT RAM(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Pradeep Verma,Mohinder Verma,Mohinder Verma, ,Digvijay Singh Bisht,Sumit Sharma,Mohinder Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Sub Divisional Collector, Karsog,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Assistant Collector,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Shri Lej Ram,(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Shri Gian Chand,(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Sh Baldev Raj(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Sh Dhani Ram(Not Applicable)

  8. 8.Sh Gopal Singh(Not Applicable)

  9. 9.Sh. Bhim Singh(Not Applicable)

  10. 10.State of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

  11. 11.Shri Kameshwar(Not Applicable)

  12. 12.Shri Kewal Ram(Not Applicable)

  13. 13.Sh. Chint Ram,(Not Applicable)

  14. 14.Shmt. Savitari Devi(Not Applicable)

  15. 15.Sh.Tej Ram,(Not Applicable)

  16. 16.Sh. Labh Singh(Not Applicable)

  17. 17.Sh.Prem Singh(Not Applicable)

  18. 18..Sh.Mandhar,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No. 6621/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed petitioner Bhagat Ram's writ petition challenging concurrent orders regarding land partition proceedings. The court found that the petitioner's objections—including that 'Farad Kabja' (possession list) was not prepared before finalizing the partition mode and that certain khasra numbers were wrongly included—were raised too late and had not been raised before lower authorities. The court noted the petitioner had accepted the partition on-site and the finalized mode of partition in 2017, thus could not subsequently challenge it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6621/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No. 6621/2026 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed petitioner Bhagat Ram's writ petition challenging concurrent orders regarding land partition proceedings. The court found that the petitioner's objections—including that 'Farad Kabja' (possession list) was not prepared before finalizing the partition mode and that certain khasra numbers were wrongly included—were raised too late and had not been raised before lower authorities. The court noted the petitioner had accepted the partition on-site and the finalized mode of partition in 2017, thus could not subsequently challenge it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case