SUSHEEL KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/6755/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010256992026

Filing Number

CWP/22351/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWP/6755/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUSHEEL KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vikas Rathore,Bhupinder Kumar,Bhupinder Kumar, ,Bhupinder Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director of Education,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Deputy Director of Education,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Principal, Government Senior secondary(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Susheel Kumar's civil writ petition by directing the competent authority to decide his representation (Annexure P-3) by passing a reasoned order within 12 weeks, in accordance with law. The court accepted notice on behalf of the State respondents through the Additional Advocate General. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/6755/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of Susheel Kumar's civil writ petition by directing the competent authority to decide his representation (Annexure P-3) by passing a reasoned order within 12 weeks, in accordance with law. The court accepted notice on behalf of the State respondents through the Additional Advocate General. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case